The White House’s top labor official has given the parties involved in the west coast labor dispute an ultimatum: end this fight here, or we’ll end it in Washington.
US Secretary of Labor Tom Perez, who flew into San Francisco earlier this week, issued the ultimatum after nine months of stalled negotiations between port owners and the labor union representing longshoreman.
The negotiations cover the contracts of 20,000 union members in 29 ports, including Los Angeles and Long Beach, two of the biggest in the US by container volume.
So far, the labor dispute has caused costly port disruptions—including a series of partial shutdowns—that have taken a toll on manufacturers facing month-long shipping delays and spoiled goods. On Friday morning, about 50 ships were stalled offshore with goods waiting to be unloaded.
If talks go sour and port owners issue a permanent shutdown, it would cost the US economy an estimated $2 billion a day.
The White House’s “Nuclear Option”
Perez’ threat to bring port leaders to Washington could mean President Obama is coming closer to using the “nuclear option” in his arsenal, the Taft-Hartley Act.
If port disruptions are deemed by the President to be a “threat to national health or safety”, the President could invoke the act to petition a federal court to block any strike or lockout.
"On behalf of President Obama, Secretary Perez made clear that the dispute has led to a very negative impact on the U.S. economy, and further delay risks tens of thousands of jobs and will cost American businesses hundreds of millions of dollars," US Dep’t of Labor
In 2002, a similar dispute involving the same set of West Coast ports ended when President George W. Bush intervened after an 11 day owner-initiated port lockout. The shutdown cost the economy an estimated $1 billion per day, or nearly 4 percent of the nation's output during that period.
Many CA politicians are placing further pressure on the President to act on the issue, with a bipartisan group of House members calling for a “swift resolution” to the strike on Thursday, and the mayor of Los Angeles making a public statement Tuesday.
“The economic impact of the increased congestion at the ports is simply unacceptable and unsustainable,” CA Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer said earlier this week.
"One Person" Conflict
The Associated Press reported on Thursday that the bulk of the conflict came down to controversy over one person: contract arbitrator Arthur Miller. Union leadership takes issue with Miller, who they view as being a biased negotiator.
Miller denied any claims of inappropriate negotiation tactics to the AP, saying he’s as “bewildered as anybody else on the outside looking in.”
So far, no outside negotiator has been able to find a permanent solution to solving the port dispute. With the White House seeming to inch closer toward issuing its executive power, time will tell if port owners and the labor union will agree on a solution that can get trade flowing freely again across the Pacific.
By Shirin Ghaffary - February 17, 2015
West Coast ports reopened today after a five day shutdown, as Labor Secretary Tom Perez meets with representatives in San Francisco to find a long term end to the nine month dispute.
The White House is ramping up its pressure to end the cargo...Read more
By Shirin Ghaffary - February 21, 2015
Both sides involved in the west coast labor dispute reached a tentative deal Friday evening, likely ending a rocky nine-month-long negotiation process that jammed the flow of shipments across the Pacific.
The Associated Press reported that...Read more
By Shirin Ghaffary - February 26, 2015
The West Coast port dispute might be over for now, but it’s left a trail of backed up cargo, and more importantly, distrust in the network of Pacific ports that account for more than half of shipments coming into the United States.
Last Friday,...Read more