Ever since COVID-19’s onset, academics have been weighing in on the best ways to address supply chain weaknesses and rebuild the industry. Take, for example, this whitepaper by Michigan State University’s Department of Supply Chain. Many of their recommendations make sense—until they start talking about resilience.
I’ve recently written about resilience: an industry buzzword that has become a favorite amongst pundits when pitching ways to rebuild supply chains. In reality, resilience represents a woefully outdated model, bound to lead us backwards. A dynamic, agile model is the true-blue superhero of supply chain—here’s why.
MSU’s Half Right, Half Wrong Take on Supply Chain
MSU’s article explains how the industry’s tunnel-vision emphasis on efficiency and speed overlooked critical vulnerabilities exposed by the pandemic. It then predicts that as companies respond to those weaknesses, there’s an opportunity to rebuild “supply chains that have better levels of financial, competitive and legal resilience.” MSU makes six recommendations for companies to follow:
Don’t get me wrong: due diligence, digitization, and excellent leadership are all valuable practices. But any steps taken to improve supply chain need to start with the right framework in order to succeed—and resilience isn’t it.
Why Resilience Works Against Supply Chain
The resilient supply chain model wants to rebuild supply chain through relying on the same practices that left it vulnerable to the point of collapse. Diversifying source materials, offshoring, and switching to domestic warehouses haven’t worked for the past 20+ years—and they certainly won’t work now. Instead, companies need to focus on building a dynamic supply chain model that:
This combination enables in real-time the agility and responsiveness that MSU nods towards, while discarding outdated and laborious practices.
Take for example, Elementum user Vitamix. During the pandemic’s height, Vitamix leveraged the real-time SaaS platform to increase communication between teams, identify supply chain incidents, and assign peer-to-peer accountability for resolution. These improvements allowed them to meet a 20% increase in demand over forecast, shorten incident resolution time, and streamline their entire S&OP process—no lengthy reviews or reassignment of resources necessary.
To break it down, here are the three must-haves for a dynamic supply chain:
The pandemic may have pushed supply chain to the brink of a long-overdue change, but companies don’t have to go over that edge alone. A supply chain services management platform like Elementum can help your company improve its operations within just a matter of days. Visit our website or email me at email@example.com to learn more.
By Brooks Ryan - October 17, 2014
Hong Kong’s inability to reign in protestors may force Mainland China into placing economic sanctions on the island, causing a domino effect on the world's supply chain.
On August 31st of this year, the Mainland China Standing Committee ruled to...Read more
By Nader Mikhail - December 23, 2020
When COVID-19 arrived in the U.S. in March, people experienced first-hand the fallout of poorly designed supply chains. The stockpiling engaged in by both homes and shopping outlets made headlines, while shortages of critical items—like PPE and...Read more
By Nader Mikhail - January 14, 2021
Thanks to the coronavirus pandemic, the adage “hindsight is 20/20” has taken a whole new meaning for supply chain management. Major breakdowns on a global level spurred an industry-wide awakening that was decades in the making. Although companies...Read more